Historical Version s - view previous versions of standard. More E The sulfur print complements macroetch methods by providing an additional procedure for evaluating the homogeneity of a steel product. Very low sulfur content steels will produce too faint an image to be useful for macrostructural evaluations.
|Published (Last):||28 October 2014|
|PDF File Size:||8.9 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.75 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Active, Most Current. Prices subject to change without notice. About Us. Contact Us. Sign In. Standards Store. Purchase History. Currency display settings. Manage society memberships. Featured Products. View All Publishers. Quality Management. SCC Standards Store. Popular Standards Bundles. Drawing and Drafting. Telecommunications Standards. AWS D1. Means, Inc. Complete Document. Includes all amendments and changes through Reapproval Notice , Detail Summary View all details.
Price USD. Single User. In Stock. Need it fast? Ask for rush delivery. Most backordered items can be rushed in from the publisher in as little as 24 hours. Some rush fees may apply. Add to Cart. View Full Details and Buy. Complementary Documents and Links:. This practice provides information required to prepare sulfur prints also referred to as Baumann Prints of most ferrous alloys to reveal the distribution of sulfide inclusions. The sulfur print reveals the distribution of sulfides in steels with bulk sulfur contents between about 0.
Certain steels contain complex sulfides that do not respond to the test solutions, for example, steels containing titanium sulfides or chromium sulfides. The sulfur print test is a qualitative test.
The density of the print image should not be used to assess the sulfur content of a steel. Under carefully controlled conditions, it is possible to compare print image intensities if the images are formed only by manganese sulfides. The sulfur print image will reveal details of the solidification pattern or metal flow from hot or cold working on appropriately chosen and prepared test specimens.
This practice does not address acceptance criteria based on the use of the method. The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard. This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
For specific precautionary statements, see Section 9. Browse Publishers. Top Sellers. My Account. Corporate Sustainability.
Investor Relations. All Rights Reserved. Update Cart. Create New Account.
Standard Practice for Preparing Sulfur Prints for Macrostructural Evaluation
Scientific Research An Academic Publisher. This paper presents a comparison of the mass loss rate of the tested materials between carbon steel A B and low alloy steel A P22 resulting from degradation effect. An experimental facility was set up to develop a prediction model for clarifying multiple degradation mechanisms that occur together. The experimental facility allows examining liquid droplet impingement erosion in the same conditions as the secondary side piping in nuclear power plants by generating the magnetite on the surface of the test materials. The magnetite is formed by controlling the water chemistry and the temperature of fluid inside the facility. In the initial stage of the experiments, the mass loss rate of A B was greater than that of A P
Standard Practice for Preparing Sulfur Prints for Macrostructural Examination